The relationship between esports organizations and their brand partners is no longer in the honeymoon phase. In the past, non-endemic brands viewed esports partnerships as an opportunity to establish a presence in the gaming community.
In 2022, the same brand partners are going a step further, demanding accurate tracking of engagement and ROI.
“Brands are getting more and more sophisticated and saying, ‘here’s the criteria that will deliver me a successful return on investment against my marketing spend, and you have to prove it to me’,” Enthusiast Gaming CEO Adrian Montgomery told Digiday earlier this week. “So if you’re the company that is aggregating audience data that can’t back that up, that’s not going to cut it for a Procter & Gamble; that’s not going to cut it for a Bacardi or a Coca-Cola.”
The past few years have been a bonanza for esports companies; teams have set successive records with the size and scope of their brand partnerships. In June 2021, TSM changed its name to TSM FTX after signing a ten-year, $210 million deal with a cryptocurrency exchange. In January of that year, Team Liquid similarly signed a 10-year extension of its partnership with PC manufacturer Alienware. With gaming gradually becoming the dominant form of entertainment, brands are turning to esports in order to reach this growing audience. “I think brands are finally starting to realize that the way you get Gen Z’s attention has totally changed,” said Lavell Juan, whose college esports platform, Brag House, counts McDonald’s and Coca-Cola among its brand partners.
Despite this rise in brand activity, hard numbers outlining the returns on brands’ esports investments are few and far between. A recent report published jointly by Nielsen and leading esports team Fnatic takes a stab at outlining some of the advantages for brands partnering with esports organizations. Digiday reached out to Nielsen, Fnatic, and other experts to shed some light on the findings and methodology behind the report.
The key details
International expansion
Another focus of the report was to track overall fan sentiment toward esports sponsors. In general, esports fans are more likely to feel positively toward events’ brand partners than traditional sports fans. “The main message for us is that the average sentiment is 55 percent positive around brands being in that space,” Mead said.
The report indeed indicated an average positive sentiment of 55 percent. Fan sentiment toward brands was slightly higher in the U.S. market, and slightly lower in the U.K. However, these findings focus on the markets most relevant to Fnatic and its fans who follow the LEC: the U.S., France, Germany and the U.K. 85 percent of the global esports audience is not included in these markets, and nearly a third of the total audience is located in China. This doesn’t mean the numbers are necessarily that far off, globally: China is rife with esports companies, and thus brand recall and sentiment in that market is likely to be high there as well.
Crunching the numbers, socially
Esports teams are able to leverage their large social media followings in support of their sponsors — an advantage that the report highlights by listing Fnatic’s total social media following as 7.6 million. This figure includes only official branded accounts, not the social accounts of Fnatic team members. “When you do that — people move a lot, and there’s this fluctuation,” Hill said.
Indeed, esports organizations’ combined follower counts can experience significant drops after losing prominent influencers. But it’s the combined figure that matters most for measuring brand exposure, and that esports organizations often use to pitch their social reach to prospective partners. Fnatic’s official branded accounts have 7.92 million followers, according to gaming and esports data platform GEEIQ — but its total social reach is 33 million, factoring in its players’ accounts. In this case, the report arguably understates an important aspect of esports teams’ potential ROI value. “The way we see it, the full ecosystem is what is really enticing and powerful, not just the official channels,” Mead said.
Plenty of fish in the sea
The report focuses on the growing ROI of brands’ partnerships with esports teams, but partnering with organizations is only one way for brands to get involved in the esports community. All of the major esports leagues have brand partners, too; brands such as BMW and Ford have had success sponsoring events in smaller esports such as Rocket League. While esports organization sponsorships can be a powerful asset, brands with deeper pockets can sign partnerships on the league level to reach a relatively wide pool of fans.
This year, the company is once again using its Super Bowl ad as a way to get potential customers to interact with the brand beyond their TV screens by offering 10,000 people free bets with the chance
This year, a 30-second spot in the Big Game will run advertisers about $6.5 million. Here's what that can buy instead in digital media.
If anything, macroeconomic issues really impact where media dollars go, not how much is spent. That could mean good news for some businesses and bad news for others. It all depends on where those businesses sit in the ecosystem.
Noelle Huynh, senior vice president, advertising and measurement research, WarnerMedia The past few years have been marked by a flurry of new streaming offerings that are supported partially or fully by advertising. A common thread among these launches is a consistent pledge to run fewer ads per hour than in traditional television broadcasts. For example, […]
Digiday caught up with Stacy Taffet, svp of brand marketing for Frito-Lay at PepsiCo, to get a sense of how the company is planning to turn a flavor into a brand and if advertising during the Super Bowl is still worth the price tag with lower ratings.
As a number of brands have decreased spend on Facebook and Instagram, DTC brand Omaha Steaks remains bullish.
Get Digiday's top stories every morning in your email inbox.
Follow @Digiday for the latest news, insider access to events and more.
